Tuesday, September 22, 2009
The citation for this act of conciliation prior to a lawsuit if the parties fail to reach an agreement, something that is not expected in this case, since the Barcelona believes that the player makes an inappropriate request.
In this situation, the Barcelona EFE reported that no claim shall accommodate Etoo and that, therefore, it seems that the player will file a lawsuit to be missing a court.
There is a similar case, which contradicts the thesis of Barcelona. Occurred in February 2008 when the social court No. 3 in A Coruña against Deportivo failed in the claim made by Albert Luque amount 2''1 million in a move to Newcastle English.
The court allowed the appeal and ordered to pay 2.1 million euros (14 million was the transfer) to the set Galician after the player and his lawyer welcomed the collective agreement for the SFA to allow the recall of 15%, despite the English club was not affected by this regulation. The
played interpreted the agreement was not applicable to the English club, but at the same time is mandatory, and ruled in favor of the player to collect 2.1 million euros.
Article 17 of the Convention states that parties affected by this regulation agree that payment to the player transfer 15% of the club pay the acquirer of rights.
0 comments:
Post a Comment